OSI-X400ops Working Group [OPS-7] E. Stefferud [draft-ietfi-x400ops-admd-00.txt} Network Management Associates 10 December 1992 Assertion of C=US; A= draft-ietf-x400ops-admd-00.txt Expires 5 Feb 1993 1. Status of this Memo This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. (The file 1id-abstracts.txt on nic.ddn.mil describes the current status of each Internet Draft.) It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a "work in progress". This is a "prestandards working draft" that will hopefully progress to Proposed Standard in some reasonable time frame. 2. Abstract This (draft) memo establishes an Internet Based X.400 Administrative Management Domain (ADMD) with the name shown in APPENDIX A, for use in the United States of America (C=US), according to the applicable rules of CCITT Recommendations and ISO Standards, and in keeping with existing regulatory practices in the United States of America. It also establishes a naming authority under the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) to register and openly publish Private Management Domain (PRMD) names subordinate to A= under C=US. NOTE: Other countries may or may not take similar actions, at their sovereign discretion. How C=US and other Internet based ADMD operations in other countries should or should not be coordinated is a proper subject for a separate document. NOTE: Any chosen C=US ADMD name is a matter of arbitrary choice as long as it does not conflict with any other choice of ADMD name by any other ADMD Service Provider operating in association with C=US. It is required to obtain consensus from the IETF, the IAB, and the Internet Society for what ever name is to be chosen, and then the right to legal use of the name must be established in The United States of America. Prior versions of this draft have asserted the name A=INTERNET. There is contention and potential for legal challenge with regard to asserting the name A=INTERNET, so the place holder has been selected for the C=US Internet ADMD name in this draft. (See APPENDIX A for more discussion of this issue.) Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 3. Introduction X.400/ISO/IEC 10021 are the International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee (CCITT) identifier for a set of Message Handling System (MHS) Recommendations [X.400] and the ISO/IEC identifier for the matching ISO/IEC Standard [10021] which many organizations in the Internet community wish to deploy for the purpose of exchanging messages. Working within X.400 specifications, this draft establishes and names the required Internet ADMD to meet the X.400 infrastructural need. The X.400 Recommendations call for a specific naming and addressing infrastructure consisting of Administrative Management Domain (ADMD) entities within each sovereign Country (C), where each ADMD must have an unambiguous name within a given country and where each ADMD then becomes a naming authority for the registration of unambiguous names of Private Management Domain (PRMD) entities, whose name values are subordinate to the ADMD which serves as their PRMD naming authority. In combination, the set of domain attributes, with their associated name values, constitute tagged attribute=value pairs which can be used to form ORAddresses (e.g., C=US; A=; P=SOME-NAME; O=COMPANY; OU=Sales) [X.411, Figure 2, Part 30 of 41]. This draft, is only concerned with ADMD and PRMD levels. 3.1. X.400 Requirements on ADMD and PRMD Names ADMD and PRMD Name values are limited by the X.400 Recommendations to a maximum length of 16 PrintableString characters [X.411, Figure B-1 (Part 2 of 3)]. Case, multiple white space characters, and leading or trailing white spaces are all non-distinguishing for purposes of matching [F.401, Section 5.3]. The PrintableString character set is essentially US-ASCII without: @ atsign ! exclamation point (bang) % percent sign _ underscore " double quote Specifically, PrintableString is a subset of International Alphabet Number 5 (IA5), shown in this table copied from [X.208, Table 5]. Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 ______________________________ Name Graphic ______________________________ Capital letters A,B,...Z Small letters a,b,...z Digits 0,1,...9 Space (space) Apostrophe ' Left parentheses ( Right parentheses ) Plus sign + Comma , Hyphen - Full stop . Solidus / Colon : Equal sign = Question mark ? ______________________________ Source: CCITT X.208, Table 5 3.2. Relationship to Domain Name System (DNS) The X.400 naming scheme has certain similarities to the Internet Domain Naming System (DNS) [DNS], which is also global and hierarchical with distribution of naming authority to entities at each subordinate level in the naming tree. Many thousands of names have already been registered in the DNS. The DNS coincidentally uses the same international register of country codes (ISO 3166 two-character codes) for its top level names (e.g,. US and GB), except that the DNS also includes UK for interesting historical reasons, and includes some three character top level domain names. Currently, these are COM, EDU, GOV, INT, MIL, NET, and ORG. It is not known whether or not additional three character top level names will be added to the DNS. It is known that additional two character country codes will be added to ISO 3166 and to the DNS. DNS names are limited to 64 characters of USASCII letters (A-Z), digits (0-9), hyphen (-) and dot (.), with dot restricted to use as a constructive delimiter between concatenated names from descending DNS levels. Case is non-distinguishing for purposes of matching. 4. Name of the C=US Internet ADMD The name of the C=US Internet ADMD is . Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 5. PRMD Names in C=US; A= Registration is accomplished by overt application to the IANA registration agent by the registrant. A registration form will be supplied by the IANA registration agent. IANA registered PRMD names will be openly published for public electronic access by the IANA. To align with CCITT X.402 and ISO/IEC 10021-2, the IANA registrar shall not register the name values of "single-space" [X.402, Section 18.3.1] or a single zero (0). [CCITT-MHS, Section 3.2.3] All IANA registered PRMD names are assumed to be the rightful intellectual property of the registration applicant, but may be subject to legal challenge of the applicant's right to use the name at any time. The IANA takes no position with regard to the legal "right to use" of any registered name, and leaves resolution of any challenge to the challenge parties, which may or may not involve litigation. In the event of challenge, the IANA only records in its register the result of whatever resolution may occur. 5.1. Sources of PRMD Registered Names PRMD names registered by the IANA under A= are drawn from (i) names already registered in the DNS naming tree, or (ii) any other name that is guaranteed not to conflict with any other IANA registered PRMD name under C=US; A=, or any current or possible future DNS name. Examples of (i) are: P=nma.com; P=nri.reston.va.us; P=nic.ddn.mil; P=nsf.gov; P=sintef.no NOTE: There is no reason to disallow C=US; A=; P=sintef.no if sintef.no wishes to so register. Therefore it is not proscribed. The key requirement is that a PRMD name must be an unambiguous string of permitted characters uniquely registered to a single owner under the registering ADMD, so any existing DNS name under any DNS top level domain may be used as a PRMD name in C=US; A= because all DNS names are already unambiguous and uniquely assigned to registrants by the IANA in the Internet DNS. This is a secondary use of a DNS name. If a name is ever removed from the DNS for any reason, then it must also be removed from the IANA PRMD name register, if it is so registered. DNS names are not automatically registered as PRMD names. Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 Examples of (ii) are: P=ESnet; P=NASA; P=IBM; P=Boeing Seattle; P=XYZZY; P=CALTRANS All such names must not conflict with any possible current or future DNS name that may or may not ever be registered. 5.2. Proscribed PRMD Names The following PRMD Names are proscribed, unless also registered in the DNS: <> Any PRMD name that is also registered in the DNS, unless it is registered in the DNS by the same registration applicant. <> Any PRMD name that ends in a dot (.) followed by any 3 characters of the kind allowed in DNS top-level domain names. <> Any PRMD name that ends in a dot (.) followed by any two characters of the kind allowed in DNS top level domain names. 6. Operation of C=US; A= The operating rules for elements of the X.400 Mail Transfer System (MTS) in the Internet are articulated in [ADMDops]. The rules for interconnection of A= with PRMDs other ADMDs are specified in [ADMDInterconnect]. 7. Security Considerations This draft does not address any aspect of security. It neither exacerbates nor reduces any security problems or risks that are already inherent in X.400 technologies or deployed systems. 8. Expiration of this Internet Draft This Internet Draft Expires 5 February 1992 9. References [X.208] CCITT Recommendation X.208, 1988, Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [X.400] CCITT Recommendation X.400, 1988, Message Handling System and Service Overview. Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 [10021] ISO/IEC 10021-1, 1988, Information Processing Systems -- Text Communication -- MOTIS -- System and Service Overview. [F.401] CCITT Recommendation F.400, 1988, Naming and Addressing for Public Message handling Services. [X.402] CCITT Recommendation X.402, 1988, Message Handling Systems: Overall Architecture. ISO/IEC 10021-2, 1988, Information Processing Systems -- Text Communication -- MOTIS -- Overall Architecture, [X.411] CCITT Recommendation X.411, 1988, Message Handling Systems: Message Transfer System: Abstract Service Definition and Procedures. ISO/IEC 10021-4, 1988, Information Processing Systems -- Text Communication -- MOTIS -- Message Transfer System: Abstract Service Definition and Procedures. [MHS] CCITT MHS, March 1992, Implementors' Guide, Version 8 [1988] [ASCII] Coded Character Set--7-Bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange, ANSI X3.4-1986. [DNS] Paul V. Mockapetris. Domain Names -- Concepts and Facilities. Request for Comments 1034, DDN Network Information Center, SRI International, November 1987. [ADMDops] [ADMDInterconnect] 10. Author's Address Einar A. Stefferud Telephone: +1 714 842 3711 Network Management Associates, Inc. Facsimile: +1 714 848 2091 10301 Drey Lane Internet: Stef@nma.com Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5615, USA Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 11. APPENDIX A: Name Value of C=US Internet ADMD Attribute The value chosen for the C=US Internet ADMD is . This value is a temporary place holder (meaning To Be Determined). It is not clear how this name value shall be decided or how it shall be secured for the exclusive use as an ADMD name by the C=US Internet. DISCUSSION: The placeholder value will be replaced with an assigned value as soon as it can be decided. It is not possible to decide the name value before progressing this draft in the IETF prestandards process. If and when this Internet Draft is finally adopted as a Proposed Standard, this text may be removed. Choosing a name for something like an ADMD is a political issue, and involves consideration of the rights of anyone to use any chosen name. In the Internet, it is not yet clear who should act to secure legal rights to the use of a selected name, even if we knew how to select an acceptable C=US ADMD name in the first place. So, this draft has been developed to lay the technical groundwork without getting hung up on the political/legal/administrative issues of name selection and establishment. With adoption of this draft as the working basis for C=US ADMD and PRMD name registration, we should next be able to progress on to name selection and legal action to secure the right to use the name. In terms of selection, the following candidate names have surfaced in the process of developing this Internet Draft. "INTERNET" "IMX" "MIX" "GO-MHS" "GO" "I" is not available for Internet use in C=US, in that it is reserved by the [CCITT X.400 | ISO MOTIS] [Recommendations | Standards] for the name of a virtual ADMD that is approved by some National Body in C=US. That National Body appears to be the FCC. We should not seek approval of any C=US National Body in the establishment of an Internet ADMD in C=US. No other ADMD has sought nor obtained any such approval, and thus the precedent has been set for the C=US Internet community to self assert its ADMD status. Internet-Draft Assertion of C=US; A= 10 December 1992 Stefferud Document Expiration: 5 Feb 1993 [Last Page]